New Paper: Designing effective image-based surveys for urban visual perception

A framework for study design encompassing the most relevant parameters (A), survey structure (B), three quantitative metrics addressing the research questions (C), and the overall contributions (D).

Highlights

  • Perception surveys of urban visual landscapes are crucial in planning and design.
  • They vary substantially and there is no standard ensuring validity and robustness.
  • We established survey design guidelines supported by statistics and experiments.
  • Robust results require >12 Likert ratings and >22 Pairwise Comparisons per image.
  • Reporting protocol to communicate effectively the design and parameters of surveys.
Comparison of overall score distribution across different demographic backgrounds.
Correlation comparisons of overall scores among three image types.

Abstract

Urban visual perception is important for the human experience in cities, shaped by intertwined characteristics of urban landscapes. By quantifying and explaining these perceptual experiences, researchers can gain insights into human preferences and support decision-making in planning and design. However, past studies have shown inconsistencies in survey design and ambiguities in reporting, leading to concerns about the reliability and reproducibility of results. This study proposes the first comprehensive framework to guide image-based survey design for capturing perceptions of outdoor urban environments across different scenarios, addressing the lack of methodological standardization in current research. We reviewed existing surveys to identify key parameters, conducted comprehensive between-subject and within-subject surveys, and performed statistical analyses to determine best practices for survey design across different contexts. Aiming to set a potential community standard, our study doubles as a blueprint for a reporting protocol for survey designs. Based on the results, we recommend: (1) meeting a minimum of 12 and 22 ratings per image for Likert Scale and Pairwise Comparison studies to reach survey reliability, respectively, and reporting these alongside other survey design parameters to enhance transparency and reproducibility; and (2) when resource allows larger experiments, adopt a ranking method such as Pairwise Comparison to achieve firmer rating results; and (3) using perspective (non-panoramic) images more frequently, as they exhibit comparable overall scores to panoramic images (R mostly >0.7), while being more widely available via crowdsourced sources, supporting their use in large-scale visual perception research.

Paper

Please check the paper here.




Enjoy Reading This Article?

Here are some more articles you might like to read next:

  • 2.5 Years at UAL
  • Master's commencement
  • Talk: Visiting University of Cambridge
  • Talk: Presentation at the CUPUM 2025 Conference